Friday, 05 June 2009 07:20

Deindividuation and Aggressive Behaviour

Written by Keiron Walsh
Rate this item
(11 votes)
Deindividuation refers to the phenomenon of a person losing their inhibitions because they are no longer identifiable. One way that people can become deindividuated is when they are part of a large group or a crowd. Deindividuation has been used to explain why people who are usually well-behaved can become violent during, for example, riots.




Festinger (1952) defined deindividuation as:

“...a state of affairs in a group where members do not pay attention to other individuals qua individuals and, correspondingly, the members do not feel they are being singled out by others”

Festinger believed that when we become deindividuated, we merge our identities with that of the group and become anonymous; this allows us to lose our inhibitions.


Studies Investigating Deindividuation

Zimbardo (1969) found that female students who wore lab coats and hoods to cover their faces gave twice as much electric shock as participants who wore their own clothes and large name badges.

Zimbardo (1969) left a car with its bonnet open in a big city (New York) and a small town (Palo Alto) and filmed how people behaved towards them. Within 10 minutes of being parked in the New York Bronx, the battery and radiator were removed and there was very little left after 3 days. The items were all removed by well-dressed, clean cut, whites. The car left in the small town was not damaged at all and a passer by lowered the bonnet when it started raining.

American children who wore identity concealing Halloween costumes were observed to steal more sweets and money than those who wore costumes where they remained identifiable (Deiner et al., 1976).

The deindividuation theory of aggression is compatible with social learning theory. According to social learning theory, simply observing another’s actions can lead to a person learning that behaviour. However, the behaviour is only exhibited if the behaviour of the model is rewarded with a favourable outcome. In Bandura’s studies, for example, the children who saw the model being punished for being violent did not act violently when they were given the opportunity to play with the doll; nevertheless, when they were asked to do what the model did they were able to copy the behaviour, indicating that learning had taken place. People may learn behaviour through social learning, but not exhibit it because of social constraints, or fear of punishment. If they later have the opportunity to exhibit the behaviour without fear of being punished (e.g., when they are deindividuated) then they may act violently.

Useful teaching resource: Quiet Rage: Stanford Prison Study - Archive footage from the original 1973 study reveals the effect of prison life on a group of normal healthy young male volunteers.

Last modified on Sunday, 13 February 2011 12:33

2 comments

  • Comment Link Gul Tuesday, 14 June 2011 17:48 posted by Gul

    deindividuation is reductionist, because it does not look at the roots of aggression. It explains how for example, the aggresion of the KKK, because of their anonymity, but the people who were in that group, made the decision to join them. Hence, the aggression was already present in mind of the individual beofre being a memeber of the group.

    It is also very deterministic, saying that we lose our free will, and that we lose our inhibitions by being in a group. It overlooks individual differences. For example, not everyone in a sports event will turn aggresive, neither will all turn aggressive in a riot, despite being anonymous, this suggests that we dont all of a sudden lose our morals by being in a group. it is not that simple, though being ina group can infuence us to an extend

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link EJEU TOM Friday, 20 May 2011 06:28 posted by EJEU TOM

    deindividation is not a sudden phenomenon but rather its a gradual process. there many different conditions which set ground for deindividation .anoymity ,group meembership ,arousal ,groupsize and responsibility work interdependently to make aperson deindividuated

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Add comment


Keiron Walsh

Keiron Walsh

If you have any tips, suggestions or would like to contribute to the site, email me at this address.

Website: alevelpsychology.co.uk E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it