Such work could have
implications for those who care what effect their faces may have upon a
beholder, from salespeople to criminal defendants, the researchers said.
In a paper appearing in the online edition this week of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Alexander Todorov, an assistant professor of psychology and public
affairs at Princeton, and Nikolaas Oosterhof, a research specialist,
continue an inquiry into the myriad messages conveyed by the human
face. In 2005, Todorov's lab garnered international headlines with a
study published in Science demonstrating that quick facial judgments
can accurately predict real-world election results.
Taking what
they have learned over time -- namely that, rightly or wrongly, people
make instant judgments about faces that guide them in how they feel
about that person -- the scientists decided to search for a way to
quantify and define exactly what it is about each person's face that
conveys a sense they can be trusted or feared. ThNew research will be published this week that may lead to polititians changing their facesey chose those precise
traits because they found they corresponded with a whole host of other
vital characteristics, such as happiness and maturity.
"Humans
seem to be wired to look to faces to understand the person's
intentions," said Todorov, who has spent years studying the subtleties
of the simple plane containing the eyes, nose and mouth. "People are
always asking themselves, 'Does this person have good or bad
intentions?'"
To conduct the study, the scientists showed
unfamiliar faces to test subjects and asked them to describe traits
they could gauge from the faces. The scientists boiled down the list of
traits to about a dozen of the most commonly cited characteristics,
including aggressiveness, unkemptness and various emotional states. The
researchers showed the faces to another group and asked them to rate
each face for the degree to which it possessed one of the dozen listed
traits.
Based on this data, the scientists found that humans
make split-second judgments on faces on two major measures -- whether
the person should be approached or avoided and whether the person is
weak or strong.
From there, using a commercial software program that generates
composites of human faces (based on laser scans of real subjects), the
scientists asked another group of test subjects to look at 300 faces
and rate them for trustworthiness, dominance and threat. Common
features of both trustworthiness and dominance emerged. A trustworthy
face, at its most extreme, has a U-shaped mouth and eyes that form an
almost surprised look. An untrustworthy face, at its most extreme, is
an angry one with the edges of the mouth curled down and eyebrows
pointing down at the center. The least dominant face possible is one
resembling a baby's with a larger distance between the eyes and the
eyebrows than other faces. A threatening face can be obtained by
averaging an untrustworthy and a dominant face.
Using the
program and the ratings from subjects, the scientists could actually
construct models of how faces vary on these social dimensions. Once
those models were established, the scientists could exaggerate faces
along these dimensions, show them to other test subjects to confirm
that they were eliciting the predicted emotional response, and find out
what facial features are critical for different social judgments.
"If
you can think of an emotion being communicated by the face as a kind of
signal, you can understand that we can amplify that signal into what
was almost a caricature to see if we get the proper effect," Todorov
said. "And we do."
The research raises questions about whether
the brain is equipped with a special mechanism for "reading" or
evaluating faces, he said. Some studies of infants have shown that,
when offered a choice between looking at a random pattern and one
resembling a human face, infants prefer the face. And there is evidence
that face-seeking is deeply rooted in both the psyche and evolution as
the amygdala, a primitive region of the brain, is stimulated when
someone spies a scary face.
While it may be true that people
have little control over their facial features, the study also
indicates that expressions may be important as well, which could have
implications for people in jobs that require extensive interactions
with the public.
Source: EurekAlert (Press Release)
